Use analysis paradigm of social psychological, this paper has compared with the subjective assessment of affordability, from the cognitive power, judgment, stress force, compression resistance, counterweights five dimensions, based on investigating urban-rural residents of four provinces, such as Shandong, Henan, Anhui, and Chongqing.Survey evidence shows that the residents are basically satisfied with the current situation of social security, but lack confidence for social equity of social security development in the future; the urban residents endure more subjective tolerance than the rural residents.The moderate justice range of social security level is 2.13~2.46 to 1 between urban and rural, but there is a big inequity social security between the urban and rural areas at the present stage.This paper proposes policy recommendations to improve the situation of social equity of urban-rural social security.
[1] 景天魁. 社会保障:公平社会的基础[J]. 中国社会科学院研究生院学报,2006,(6).
[2] 郑功成. 中国社会保障改革与发展战略—理念、目标与行动方案[M]. 北京:人民出版社,2008. 10.
[3] Deutsch M. Distributive Justice:A Social Psychological Perspective[M]. New Haven,CT:Yale University Press,1985.
[4] Park,Dekay & Krause. Aggregating Social Behavior into Person Models:Percieved Induced Consistency[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1994,66.
[5] Hatfield et al. Equity and Intimate Relations:Recent Research[A]. In W. Ickes (Ed). Compatible and Incompatible Relationships[M]. New York:Springer Verlag,1985. 91-118.
[6] Surra C. A. Research and Theory on Mate Selection and Premarital Relationships in the 1980s[J]. Journal of Marriage and the Family,1990,52.