Based on the data of an ad hoc survey on Shenzhen's migrant rural workers in 2005, the paper analyzes Chinese rural migrant workers' social integration in terms of behavioral and emotional perspectives, and explores the impact of behavioral integration, which is represented by the social support network, on their present and future emotional integration. The research shows that, in terms of behavioral integration, the scale of the social support network of migrant rural workers is small, and the difference in percentages of strong ties and weak ties is not significant. In terms of emotional integration, the overall situation of the workers' social integration is sound, demonstrating in that the migrant workers are satisfied with their living conditions, the urban residents basically hold a positive attitude towards and would not discriminate the migrant workers. While in terms of emotional integration intention, both the behavioral and emotional integration have prominent impacts on the migrant workers' preference for friends and plan for future life.
[1] Schwarzweller H. K. Parental family ties and social integration of rural to urban migrant s[J]. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1964, 26(4):410-416.
[2] 任远、邬民乐. 城市流动人口的社会融合:文献述评[J]. 人口研究, 2006, 30(3):87-94.
[3] Durkheim E. Suicide:A Study in sociology. Translated by John A. Spaulding and George Simpson Free Press, 1966.
[4] Berger-Schimitt, R. Social cohesion as an aspect of the quality of societies:concept and measurement. Eureporting Working Paper, 2000.14.
[5] Myers S. M. Childhood migration and social integration in adulthood[J]. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1999, 61(3):774-789.
[6] 何汇江. 城市贫困群体的社会分裂和融合[J]. 人文杂志, 2004, (3):164-169.
[7] 钱文荣, 张忠明. 农民工在城市社会的融合度问题[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2006, 36(4):115-121.
[8] Myers S M. Childhood migration and social integration in adulthood[J]. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1999, 61(3):774-789.
[9] Landecker W S. Types of integration and their measurement[J]. The American Journal of Sociology, 1951, 56(4):332-340.
[10] Scott R A. Deviance, sanctions, and social integration in small-scale societies[J]. Social Forces, 1976, 54(3):604-620.
[11] 李树茁, 任义科, 费尔德曼, 杨绪松. 中国农民工的整体社会网络特征分析[J]. 中国人口科学, 2006, (3):19-29.
[12] 李树茁, 杨绪松, 悦中山, 靳小怡. 农民工社会支持网络的现状及其影响因素研究[J]. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2007, (1):67-76.
[13] 李树茁, 杨绪松, 任义科, 靳小怡. 农民工的社会网络与职业阶层和收入:来自深圳调查的发现[J]. 当代经济科学, 2007, (1):25-33.
[14] 同[7] .
[15] Alw in D F, Converse P E, Martin S S. Living arrangement s and social integration[J]. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1985, 47(2):319-334.
[16] Agneessens F, Waege H, Lievens J. Diversity in social support by role relations:A typology[J]. Social Networks, 2006, (28):427-441.
[17] Van del Poel M G M. Delineating personal support network[J]. Social Forces, 1993, (15):49-70.
[18] 李汉林. 关系强度与虚拟社区—农民工研究的一种视角. 李培林. 农民工:中国进城农民工的经济社会分析[M]. 北京:社会科学文献出版社, 2003. 96-115.
[19] Grannovetter M. The strength of weak ties[J]. The American Journal of Sociology, 1973, 78(6):1360-1380.
[20] Bian Y. Bringing strong ties back in:Indirect connection, bridge, and job search in China[J]. American Sociological Review, 1997, (62):266-285.
[21] 边燕杰, 张文宏. 经济体制、社会网络与职业流动[J]. 中国社会科学, 2001, (2):77-89.